Skip to content
  • About
    • Firm News
    • Speaking Engagements
    • Authorship
    • Newsletters
    • Videos
    • Commitment to Environmental Sustainability
    • Certifications
    • Awards
  • Our Team
  • Practice Areas
    • Alternative Dispute Resolution
    • Aviation Litigation
    • Commercial Litigation
  • Diversity & Community
  • Contact
  • About
    • Firm News
    • Speaking Engagements
    • Authorship
    • Newsletters
    • Videos
    • Commitment to Environmental Sustainability
    • Certifications
    • Awards
  • Our Team
  • Practice Areas
    • Alternative Dispute Resolution
    • Aviation Litigation
    • Commercial Litigation
  • Diversity & Community
  • Contact
  • About
    • Firm News
    • Speaking Engagements
    • Authorship
    • Newsletters
    • Videos
    • Commitment to Environmental Sustainability
    • Certifications
    • Awards
  • Our Team
  • Practice Areas
    • Alternative Dispute Resolution
    • Aviation Litigation
    • Commercial Litigation
  • Diversity & Community
  • Contact
  • About
    • Firm News
    • Speaking Engagements
    • Authorship
    • Newsletters
    • Videos
    • Commitment to Environmental Sustainability
    • Certifications
    • Awards
  • Our Team
  • Practice Areas
    • Alternative Dispute Resolution
    • Aviation Litigation
    • Commercial Litigation
  • Diversity & Community
  • Contact

Assessing Your Company’s Exposure In An Employment Discrimination Case

A recent Pennsylvania case highlights the substantial liabilities employers face in navigating the complexities of employment discrimination law and offers insight into how employers can limit their exposure. A person who wins an employment discrimination case can collect, among other funds, monies for back pay and front pay. Back pay is the difference between what an employee was paid and the amount the employee should have been paid, had there been no discrimination. Courts may order an employer to pay an employee back all underpaid monies from up to 2 years before the employee’s discrimination charge all the way up to the time of trial. Front pay damages can be even greater. Front pay consists of all monies the employee is expected to lose before finding a substantially equivalent position.

On April 23, 2009 in Donlin v. Philips Lighting North America Corp., the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit found that a temporary warehouse employee who worked for an offending company for less than a year before being denied a permanent position could properly be awarded 10 years’ worth of front pay damages amounting to nearly $400,000.

Employers are always well advised to review their hiring, promotion and discharge practices with counsel to minimize the risk of discriminatory practices occurring. In light of the court’s decision, employers should in particular make sure that these same practices are just as carefully utilized in deciding upon the applications of temporary employees for permanent positions. As shown in Donlin, one discriminatory decision can be extremely costly. Finally, where an employment discrimination claim is brought, before digging in for a litigation battle, consideration should be given to whether the employee should be given the position sought or whether settlement negotiations should be quickly pursued, to limit the company’s exposure for the employee’s lost back pay and front pay.

Next Newsletter →

Physical Address:

230 S. Broad Street, 17th Floor

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19102

 

Mailing Address:

P.O. Box 608, 200 Chester Ave., Suite 1

Moorestown, NJ 08057-9998

Telephone: 267.918.4526

Facsimile: 215.238.1779

[email protected]

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Search

ADMIN LOGIN   |  The Axelrod Firm, PC  © 2025 All rights reserved   |   Disclaimer   |   Privacy Policy